One of the most educational matters of the recent decade is the teaching method used in universities and schools. Thus, the prompt recommends that we focus only on positive reinforcement and reject negative reinforcement. In my viewpoint, I mostly agree with this recommendation for the following two reasons. However, I do concede that it is seldom a helpful way to teach new materials to obstreperous children.
To begin, If you conduct a survey of a large group of people, they will definitely like to be awarded. I believe this because I will never forget the prizes I was given as a little student in school. For example, students can be awarded for getting the highest scores on the final tests, winning a sports competition, or doing socially philanthropic activities. This will surely improve their performance in courses and their personal life as well. In addition, it will have a nationwide impact, and maybe a teacher or school will go on the news TV channels universally. The above example illustrates that positive reinforcement will have a terrific effect on the outcome of the education system.
Another reason that I think admiration of positive action in a school or college is the better option is that giving praise to the children will positively create a better personality for them. For instance, If a teacher admires a student for solving his assignments or homework on time, he will continue to do the same for the rest of his life. Consider an employee who does the assigned projects in the meantime and makes his boss happy to have him in the company. So, we see that this personality-maker technique has a crucial influence on people.
However, I do admit that the negative reinforcement technique will apply the best for truculent kids. Since they are extremely noisy and difficult to control, it is a better alternative to admonish them to learn new lessons in school. To illustrate, one student who has not learned how to carry out simple multiplications will undoubtedly be in significant trouble in the future. In addition, Gauss, the mathematician, is the conspicuous epitome of negative reinforcement. As his teacher obliged him to add up numbers 1 to 100 in a short time, he came up with a new rapid way to solve this problem.
To conclude, I do agree that teachers should praise students positively for the two reasons outlined above. Nevertheless, I do acknowledge that this technique is not without flaws, primarily the fact that it would be applicable for the most proportion. Positive reinforcement usually operates well in the modern world rather than antediluvian.